Abbreviations
BCCbasal cell carcinoma
SCCsquamous cell carcinoma
SNPsingle nucleotide polymorphism
TO THE EDITOR
The conserved p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) was initially identified as a nuclear protein that interacts with the DNA-binding domain of tumor suppressor p53 and enhances p53-mediated transcription activation (
Iwabuchi et al., 1998
). The interaction region of 53BP1, BRCT (BRCA1 C-terminus) repeats, are present in several proteins involved in DNA repair and cell cycle control, suggesting a direct role of 53BP1 in the cellular response to DNA damage and maintenance of genomic stability (Rappold et al., 2001
; Joo et al., 2002
). Recently, studies suggested that 53BP1 is a central mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint signaling (Wang et al., 2002
) and it directly participates in the repair for DNA double-strand breaks (Huyen et al., 2004
). 53BP1-deficient mice exhibit growth retardation, high-radiation sensitivity, and tumor development features that are indicative of a defective DNA damage response (Ward et al., 2003
). 53BP1 has been shown to constitutively have an important role in the etiology of human cancer (DiTullio et al., 2002
). It is plausible that sequence variation in the regulatory and coding regions of the 53BP1 gene might affect its transcription and protein structure thus, its biological function in checkpoint signaling and DNA repair, leads to susceptibility to cancers.In this study, we hypothesized that that common genetic variants of 53BP1 were associated with risk of skin cancer. We comprehensively surveyed common genetic variation of the 53BP1 gene using two complementary approaches, including putatively functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and choosing tagging-SNPs in the 53BP1 gene locus (introns and exons as well as 20kb upstream and 20kb downstream of the coding region). We performed a skin cancer case-control study of Caucasians nested within the Nurses' Health Study to evaluate whether these common genetic variants are associated with the risks of non-melanoma skin cancers (squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC)) along with melanoma risk. We further investigated the association of these genetic variants with pigmentary phenotypes (hair color, skin color, tanning ability, and the number of moles). The nested case-control study consisted of 218 incident melanoma cases, 285 incident SCC cases, 300 incident BCC cases, and 870 age-matched controls. A detailed description of the selection and characteristics of cases and controls was published previously (
Han et al., 2005
).We included four putatively functional SNPs that have been identified in the promoter and coding regions of 53BP1 (http://egp.gs.washington.edu): rs1869258, rs560191, rs689647, and rs2602141. Using genotype data from the 90 CEU samples in the HapMap project, we further selected four tagging-SNPs by the Tagger program (r2>0.8): rs3862138, rs17782975, rs2242069, and rs999047 (Supplementary Figure S1 online and Supplementary Table S1 online). We genotyped the eight SNPs by the 5′ nuclease assay (TaqMan) in 384-well format, using the ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The distributions of genotypes for the eight SNPs were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium among controls. Because the three SNPs (rs1869258, rs560191, and rs2602141) are in high linkage disequilibrium (each pair-wise r2>0.9, Supplementary Table S2 online), we anticipated that these three SNPs would show similar effects on pigmentary phenotypes and skin cancer risk.
- Supplementary Materials
We evaluated the main effect of the selected polymorphisms across the three types of skin cancer using unconditional logistic regression (Table 1). In the analyses controlling for the age, we found that three SNPs (rs689647, rs2242069, and rs999047) were consistently associated with a significantly decreased risk of BCC (additive odds ratio and 95% confidence interval: 0.69 (0.50–0.95), 0.68 (0.51–0.90), and 0.66 (0.48–0.91), respectively). These three SNPs are in moderate linkage disequilibrium (pair-wise r2 between 0.27 and 0.70, Supplementary Table S2 online). The non-synonymous SNP, rs689647 (G412S), has been investigated in a case-control study of breast cancer but found no association with breast cancer risk (
Frank et al., 2005
). We did not observe significant association between three putatively functional SNPs (rs1869258, rs560191, and rs2602141) and any type of skin cancer, which was consistent with previous studies (Frank et al., 2005
; Ma et al., 2006
; Rapakko et al., 2007
). We further evaluated haplotypes based on the four SNPs (rs689647, rs2602141, rs2242069, and rs999047) that modified the risk of the cancer subtypes (Table 1). We found that the variant allele of rs689647 was often inherited together with that of the other three SNPs and formed a haplotype in 11% of the population. This haplotype was significantly associated with a decreased risk of BCC (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.45–0.96), suggesting a protective effect on BCC compared with the most frequent haplotype carrying all wild-type alleles in approximately 60% of the population. However, the haplotype carrying only the variant allele of rs2242066 or rs999047 was not significantly associated with BCC risk as suggested in single-SNP analysis, though the latter showed a non-significant decreased risk of BCC. Of note, the last haplotype carrying only the variant allele of rs999047 was associated with a non-significant increased risk of melanoma (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.96–4.07), which was stronger than the association of single-SNP analysis (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.90–1.68). These associations did not change substantially after additional adjustment for potential risk factors including pigmentary phenotypes, family history of skin cancer, geographic region, accumulative sun exposure, sunburns, and sunlamp use or tanning salon attendance. We did not observe any statistically significant interaction between pigmentary phenotypes and genetic variants on skin cancer risk.Table 1Associations between selected SNPs in 53BP1 region and skin cancer risk
Melanoma | SCC | BCC | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Controls (%) | Cases (%) | Multivariate OR | Cases (%) | Multivariate OR | Cases (%) | Multivariate OR | |
5′ UTR | |||||||
rs3862138 | |||||||
CC | 503 (62.9) | 132 (63.5) | 1.00 (ref) | 173 (66.3) | 1.00 (ref) | 179 (65.1) | 1.00 (ref) |
CT+TT | 297 (37.1) | 76 (36.5) | 0.99 (0.72-1.36) | 88 (33.7) | 0.85 (0.63–1.14) | 96 (34.9) | 0.90 (0.68-1.21) |
Per copy of T | 0.93 (0.71-1.24) | 0.95 (0.74–1.21) | 0.98 (0.77-1.24) | ||||
P for trend | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.86 | ||||
Coding region | |||||||
rs17782975 | |||||||
TT | 670 (81.8) | 168 (82.4) | 1.00 (ref) | 222 (81.0) | 1.00 (ref) | 227 (82.8) | 1.00 (ref) |
TC+CC | 149 (18.2) | 36 (17.6) | 0.96 (0.64-1.44) | 52 (19.0) | 1.05 (0.74–1.49) | 47 (17.2) | 0.92 (0.64-1.33) |
Per copy of C | 1.00 (0.68-1.48) | 1.10 (0.79–1.52) | 0.92 (0.65-1.30) | ||||
P for trend | 0.99 | 0.58 | 0.62 | ||||
rs689647 (G412S) | |||||||
CC | 635 (76.5) | 155 (75.2) | 1.00 (ref) | 225 (82.1) | 1.00 (ref) | 243 (82.9) | 1.00 (ref) |
CT+TT | 195 (23.5) | 51 (24.8) | 1.08 (0.76-1.55) | 49 (17.9) | 0.71 (0.50–1.01) | 50 (17.1) | 0.68 (0.48-0.95) |
Per copy of T | 1.05 (0.76–1.46) | 0.74 (0.53–1.02) | 0.69 (0.50-0.95) | ||||
P for trend | 0.77 | 0.07 | 0.02 | ||||
rs2602141 (K1136Q) | |||||||
TT | 389 (46.4) | 86 (41.0) | 1.00 (ref) | 143 (52.4) | 1.00 (ref) | 154 (52.0) | 1.00 (ref) |
TG+GG | 449 (53.6) | 124 (59.0) | 1.27 (0.93–1.72) | 130 (47.6) | 0.78 (0.60–1.03) | 142 (48.0) | 0.80 (0.61-1.05) |
Per copy of G | 1.05 (0.83–1.34) | 0.85 (0.69–1.06) | 0.86 (0.70-1.06) | ||||
P for trend | 0.67 | 0.14 | 0.15 | ||||
rs2242069 | |||||||
TT | 545 (67.0) | 132 (65.3) | 1.00 (ref) | 194 (72.9) | 1.00 (ref) | 212 (76.3) | 1.00 (ref) |
TG+GG | 269 (33.0) | 70 (34.7) | 1.09 (0.79–1.52) | 72 (27.1) | 0.75 (0.55–1.02) | 66 (23.7) | 0.63 (0.46-0.86) |
Per copy of G | 1.13 (0.85–1.50) | 0.83 (0.63–1.09) | 0.68 (0.51-0.90) | ||||
P for trend | 0.41 | 0.18 | 0.01 | ||||
3′ UTR | |||||||
rs999047 | |||||||
AA | 597 (74.5) | 136 (69.7) | 1.00 (ref) | 220 (80.3) | 1.00 (ref) | 226 (81.9) | 1.00 (ref) |
AG+GG | 204 (25.5) | 59 (30.3) | 1.29 (0.91–1.82) | 54 (19.7) | 0.72 (0.51–1.00) | 50 (18.1) | 0.65 (0.46-0.91) |
Per copy of G | 1.23 (0.90–1.68) | 0.82 (0.60–1.10) | 0.66 (0.48-0.91) | ||||
P for trend | 0.2 | 0.18 | 0.01 | ||||
Haplotype (A B C D) | |||||||
0 0 0 0 | 863 (61.1) | 203 (59.3) | 1.00 | 288 (61.5) | 1.00 | 326 (65.3) | 1.00 |
0 1 0 0 | 279 (19.8) | 63 (18.5) | 0.97 (0.70–1.35) | 92 (19.7) | 0.99 (0.75–1.30) | 98 (19.5) | 0.92 (0.71-1.21) |
1 1 1 1 | 160 (11.3) | 40 (11.7) | 1.08 (0.73–1.60) | 42 (9.0) | 0.78 (0.54–1.13) | 40 (8.0) | 0.66 (0.45-0.96) |
0 0 1 0 | 73 (5.2) | 21 (6.2) | 1.28 (0.76–2.17) | 27 (5.7) | 1.12 (0.69–1.82) | 26 (5.2) | 0.89 (0.55-1.43) |
0 0 0 1 | 24 (1.7) | 11 (3.2) | 1.97 (0.96–4.07) | 11 (2.4) | 1.40 (0.68–2.87) | 5 (1.1) | 0.59 (0.22-1.61) |
Rare<1% combined | 12 (0.9) | 4 (1.2) | 1.42 (0.45–4.54) | 8 (1.8) | 1.92 (0.80–4.63) | 4 (0.9) | 0.89 (0.29-2.75) |
P for global test | 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.31 |
Abbreviations: BCC, basal cell carcinoma; OR, odds ratio; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; UTR, untranslated region; 53BP1, p53-binding protein 1.
1 Unconditional logistic regression adjusted for age;
2 The two SNPs (rs1869258 and rs560191) that are in high linkage disequilibrium with rs2602141 (each pair-wise r2>0.9) showed similar associations with the risk of melanoma, SCC and BCC.
3 Haplotype based on the four SNPs A: rs689647; B: rs2602141; C:rs2242069; D: rs999047; 0, wild-type allele; 1, variant allele.
We evaluated the associations between the selected SNPs and pigmentary phenotypes among controls using linear regression models (Table 2). We found the three highly correlated putatively functional SNPs (rs1869258, rs560191, and rs2602141) were associated with lighter hair color (P for trend, 0.04, 0.07, and 0.03, respectively) and more moles (P for trend, 0.02, 0.003, and 0.003, respectively). We also found one intronic SNP in 5′ terminus, rs17782975, was significantly associated with more moles (P for trend, 0.01). No statistically significant associations between genetic variants and skin color or tanning ability were observed. To our knowledge, this is the first report that 53BP1 is associated with pigmentary phenotypes in Caucasians, although this gene has shown clear evidence of adaptive skin pigmentation selection in Africans (
Izagirre et al., 2006
). Two other genes involved in DNA repair, p53 and MDM2, have been reported to be associated with pigmentary phenotypes (Cui et al., 2007
; Nan et al., 2009
).Table 2Associations between selected SNPs in 53BP1 region and hair color and moles among controls
Hair color | Moles | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SNP | β1 | SE | P-value | β 1 The regression parameter β refers to the mean change in scoring in hair color (black to blonde) and number of moles per copy of the SNP minor allele. We regressed an ordinal coding for hair color (1=black; 2=dark brown; 3=light brown; 4=blonde; and 5=red) or number of moles (1: none; 2: 1–2; 3: 3-5; 4: 6-9; 5: 10-14 and 5: 15+) on an ordinal coding for genotype (0, 1, or 2 copies of SNP minor allele). β>0 means that the SNP is associated with lighter hair color and more moles. | SE | P-value |
rs3862138 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
rs17782975 | -0.01 | 0.16 | 0.96 | 0.45 | 0.18 | 0.01 |
rs689647 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.22 |
rs2602141 | 0.22 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.31 | 0.11 | 0.003 |
rs2242069 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 0.44 |
rs999047 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.16 | -0.08 | 0.14 | 0.57 |
Abbreviations: SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; 53BP1, p53-binding protein 1.
1 The regression parameter β refers to the mean change in scoring in hair color (black to blonde) and number of moles per copy of the SNP minor allele. We regressed an ordinal coding for hair color (1=black; 2=dark brown; 3=light brown; 4=blonde; and 5=red) or number of moles (1: none; 2: 1–2; 3: 3-5; 4: 6-9; 5: 10-14 and 5: 15+) on an ordinal coding for genotype (0, 1, or 2 copies of SNP minor allele). β>0 means that the SNP is associated with lighter hair color and more moles.
2 The two SNPs (rs1869258 and rs560191) that are in high linkage disequilibrium with rs2602141 (each pair-wise r2>0.9) showed similar associations with hair color (P-value, 0.04 and 0.07, respectively) and moles (P-value, 0.02 and 0.003, respectively).
In summary, we systematically evaluated the common genetic variants of the 53BP1 gene and the risk of skin cancer. We found three SNPs (rs689647, rs2242069, and rs999047) were significantly associated with a decreased risk of BCC. These findings may lead to further replication and functional studies that will elucidate the underlying mechanisms of skin cancer development associated with these genetic variants.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Dr Hardeep Ranu and Ms Pati Soule for their laboratory assistance, and Ms Carolyn Guo for her programming support. We are indebted to the participants in the Nurses' Health Study for their dedication and commitment. Grant sponsor: NIH Grants CA122838 and CA128080.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Supplementary material is linked to the online version of the paper at http://www.nature.com/jid
REFERENCES
- Central role of p53 in the suntan response and pathologic hyperpigmentation.Cell. 2007; 128: 853-864
- 53BP1 functions in an ATM-dependent checkpoint pathway that is constitutively activated in human cancer.Nat Cell Biol. 2002; 4: 998-1002
- TP53-binding protein variants and breast cancer risk: a case-control study.Breast Cancer Res. 2005; 7: R502-R505
- Genetic variation in XPD, sun exposure, and risk of skin cancer.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14: 1539-1544
- Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks.Nature. 2004; 432: 406-411
- Stimulation of p53-mediated transcriptional activation by the p53-binding proteins, 53BP1 and 53BP2.J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 26061-26068
- A scan for signatures of positive selection in candidate loci for skin pigmentation in humans.Mol Biol Evol. 2006; 23: 1697-1706
- Structure of the 53BP1 BRCT region bound to p53 and its comparison to the Brca1 BRCT structure.Genes Dev. 2002; 16: 583-593
- Joint effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms in P53BP1 and p53 on breast cancer risk in a Chinese population.Carcinogenesis. 2006; 27: 766-771
- A functional SNP in the MDM2 promoter, pigmentary phenotypes, and risk of skin cancer.Cancer Causes Control. 2009; 20: 171-179
- Germline alterations in the 53BP1 gene in breast and ovarian cancer families.Cancer Lett. 2007; 245: 337-340
- Tumor suppressor p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) is involved in DNA damage-signaling pathways.J Cell Biol. 2001; 153: 613-620
- 53BP1, a mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint.Science. 2002; 298: 1435-1438
- p53 binding protein 53BP1 is required for DNA damage responses and tumor suppression in mice.Mol Cell Biol. 2003; 23: 2556-2563
Article info
Footnotes
The authors state no conflict of interest.
Identification
Copyright
© 2010 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc.
User license
Elsevier user license | How you can reuse
Elsevier's open access license policy

Elsevier user license
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article
Not Permitted
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
Elsevier's open access license policy