x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Melanoma
- Mann, Graham JRemove Mann, Graham J filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2016 and 2019.
Author
- Scolyer, Richard A2
- Barrett, Jennifer H1
- Bishop, D Timothy1
- Brossard, Myriam1
- Brown, Kevin M1
- Bui, Minh1
- Colebatch, Andrew J1
- Cust, Anne E1
- Demenais, Florence1
- Dobrovic, Alexander1
- Drummond, Martin1
- Ferguson, Peter1
- Goldstein, Alisa M1
- Hayward, Nicholas K1
- Hoggart, Clive1
- Hopper, John L1
- Iles, Mark M1
- Jayawardana, Kaushala1
- Johansson, Peter A1
- Kanetsky, Peter A1
- Kazakoff, Stephen H1
- Landi, Maria Teresa1
- Law, Matthew H1
- Long, Georgina V1
Keyword
- AJCC1
- American Joint Committee on Cancer1
- area under receiver operating characteristic curves1
- AUC1
- CI1
- confidence interval1
- ddPCR1
- droplet digital PCR1
- leave-one-out cross-validation1
- LOOCV1
- microRNA1
- miRNA1
- net reclassification improvement1
- NRI1
- odds ratio1
- OR1
- single nucleotide polymorphism1
- SNP1
- TCGA1
- The Cancer Genome Atlas1
- WGS1
- whole genome sequencing1
Melanoma
3 Results
- Original Article Melanocytes/MelanomaOpen Archive
Molecular Genomic Profiling of Melanocytic Nevi
Journal of Investigative DermatologyVol. 139Issue 8p1762–1768Published online: February 14, 2019- Andrew J. Colebatch
- Peter Ferguson
- Felicity Newell
- Stephen H. Kazakoff
- Tom Witkowski
- Alexander Dobrovic
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 40The benign melanocytic nevus is the most common tumor in humans and rarely transforms into cutaneous melanoma. Elucidation of the nevus genome is required to better understand the molecular steps of progression to melanoma. We performed whole genome sequencing on a series of 14 benign melanocytic nevi consisting of both congenital and acquired types. All nevi had driver mutations in the MAPK signaling pathway, either BRAF V600E or NRAS Q61R/L. No additional definite driver mutations were identified. - Original Article Melanocytes/MelanomaOpen Access
Assessing the Incremental Contribution of Common Genomic Variants to Melanoma Risk Prediction in Two Population-Based Studies
Journal of Investigative DermatologyVol. 138Issue 12p2617–2624Published online: June 8, 2018- Anne E. Cust
- Martin Drummond
- Peter A. Kanetsky
- Australian Melanoma Family Study Investigators
- Leeds Case-Control Study Investigators
- Alisa M. Goldstein
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 34It is unclear to what degree genomic and traditional (phenotypic and environmental) risk factors overlap in their prediction of melanoma risk. We evaluated the incremental contribution of common genomic variants (in pigmentation, nevus, and other pathways) and their overlap with traditional risk factors, using data from two population-based case-control studies from Australia (n = 1,035) and the United Kingdom (n = 1,460) that used the same questionnaires. Polygenic risk scores were derived from 21 gene regions associated with melanoma and odds ratios from published meta-analyses. - Original Article Melanocytes/MelanomaOpen Archive
Identification, Review, and Systematic Cross-Validation of microRNA Prognostic Signatures in Metastatic Melanoma
Journal of Investigative DermatologyVol. 136Issue 1p245–254Published in issue: January, 2016- Kaushala Jayawardana
- Sarah-Jane Schramm
- Varsha Tembe
- Samuel Mueller
- John F. Thompson
- Richard A. Scolyer
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 58In metastatic melanoma, it is vital to identify and validate biomarkers of prognosis. Previous studies have systematically evaluated protein biomarkers or mRNA-based expression signatures. No such analyses have been applied to microRNA (miRNA)-based prognostic signatures. As a first step, we identified two prognostic miRNA signatures from publicly available data sets (Gene Expression Omnibus/The Cancer Genome Atlas) of global miRNA expression profiling information. A 12-miRNA signature predicted longer survival after surgery for resection of American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III disease (>4 years, no sign of relapse) and outperformed American Joint Committee on Cancer standard-of-care prognostic markers in leave-one-out cross-validation analysis (error rates 34% and 38%, respectively).