x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Psoriasis
- Griffiths, Christopher EMRemove Griffiths, Christopher EM filter
- Smith, Catherine HRemove Smith, Catherine H filter
Author
- Ashcroft, Darren M3
- Warren, Richard B3
- Lunt, Mark2
- Murphy, Ruth2
- Reynolds, Nick J2
- Yiu, Zenas ZN2
- Burden, A David1
- Evans, Ian1
- Exton, Lesley S1
- Iskandar, Ireny YK1
- Jabbar-Lopez, Zarif1
- Mason, Kayleigh J1
- McElhone, Kathleen1
- Mohd Mustapa, M Firouz1
- Ormerod, Anthony D1
- Owen, Caroline M1
- Parslew, Richard1
- Samarasekera, Eleanor J1
- Venning, Vanessa1
- Walton, Shernaz1
Keyword
- CI3
- confidence interval3
- BADBIR2
- British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register2
- hazard ratio2
- HR2
- TNFI2
- adjHR1
- adjusted hazard ratio1
- adverse event1
- AE1
- GRADE1
- Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria1
- interquartile range1
- IQR1
- odds ratio1
- OR1
- PASI1
- PSOLAR1
- Psoriasis Area and Severity Index1
- Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry1
- randomized controlled trial1
- RCT1
- tumor necrosis factor inhibitor1
- tumor necrosis factor inhibitors1
Psoriasis
3 Results
- Original Article Clinical Research: Patient OutcomesOpen Access
Differential Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis: Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR)
Journal of Investigative DermatologyVol. 138Issue 4p775–784Published online: October 25, 2017- Ireny Y.K. Iskandar
- Richard B. Warren
- Mark Lunt
- Kayleigh J. Mason
- Ian Evans
- Kathleen McElhone
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 62Little is known about the drug survival of second-line biologic therapies for psoriasis in routine clinical practice. We assessed drug survival of second-line biologic therapies and estimated the risk of recurrent discontinuation due to adverse events or ineffectiveness in patients with psoriasis who had failed a first biologic therapy and switched to a second in a large, multicenter pharmacovigilance registry (n = 1,239; adalimumab, n = 538; etanercept, n = 104; ustekinumab, n = 597). The overall drug survival rate in the first year after switching was 77% (95% confidence interval = 74–79%), falling to 58% (55–61%) in the third year. - Original Article Clinical ResearchOpen Access
Risk of Serious Infection in Patients with Psoriasis Receiving Biologic Therapies: A Prospective Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR)
Journal of Investigative DermatologyVol. 138Issue 3p534–541Published online: October 17, 2017- Zenas Z.N. Yiu
- Catherine H. Smith
- Darren M. Ashcroft
- Mark Lunt
- Shernaz Walton
- Ruth Murphy
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 51Serious infection is a concern for patients with psoriasis receiving biologic therapies. We assessed the risk of serious infections for biologics used to treat psoriasis by comparison with a cohort receiving non-biologic systemic therapies in a propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards model using data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register. Overall, 1,352; 3,271; and 994 participants were included in the etanercept, adalimumab, ustekinumab cohorts, respectively, and 3,421 participants were in the non-biologic cohort. - Original Article EpidemiologyOpen Access
Risk of Serious Infections in Patients with Psoriasis on Biologic Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Journal of Investigative DermatologyVol. 136Issue 8p1584–1591Published online: April 13, 2016- Zenas Z.N. Yiu
- Lesley S. Exton
- Zarif Jabbar-Lopez
- M. Firouz Mohd Mustapa
- Eleanor J. Samarasekera
- A. David Burden
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 57A comprehensive evaluation of the risk of serious infections in biologic therapies for psoriasis is lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies reporting serious infections in people taking any licensed biologic therapy for psoriasis compared with those taking placebo, nonbiologic therapy, or other biologic therapies. The quality of the studies was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria.